Re: Standard test parameters for NAS workloads?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



These are the fio settings used by StorageReview.com in their benchmarks: https://www.storagereview.com/fio-flexible-i-o-tester-synthetic-benchmark

Ars Technica’s series on RAID vs. ZFS (https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/05/zfs-versus-raid-eight-ironwolf-disks-two-filesystems-one-winner) used this set of tests: https://github.com/jimsalterjrs/fio-test-scaffolding



> On Dec 21, 2020, at 2:49 PM, rickyp999@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm curious whether there are some standard or at least common test
> parameters for benchmarking NAS workloads.
> 
> If NAS is too specific, even a general one for HDD/SSD would be
> greatly appreciated.  My motivation is to use a common set of
> benchmarks to compare how options like RAID levels, network
> speed/protocol (through a NFS/SMB mount), and SSD cache affect
> performance.
> 
> Thank you,




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux