> -----Original Message-----
> From: fio-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <fio-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf
> Of Andreas Herrmann
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 5:05 AM
> To: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: fio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] thread_options: Add cgroup_use_bfq
>
...
> @@ -593,11 +594,13 @@ struct thread_options_pack {
> uint8_t profile[FIO_TOP_STR_MAX];
>
> /*
> - * blkio cgroup support
> + * (blk)io cgroup support
> */
> uint8_t cgroup[FIO_TOP_STR_MAX];
> uint32_t cgroup_weight;
> uint32_t cgroup_nodelete;
> + uint32_t cgroup_use_bfq;
> + uint32_t padding; /* remove when possible to maintain alignment */
>
> uint32_t uid;
> uint32_t gid;
Since the structure already has three pad fields:
uint32_t pad;
uint64_t size;
...
uint32_t pad2;
uint64_t rand_seed;
...
uint32_t pad3;
fio_fp64_t percentile_list[FIO_IO_U_LIST_MAX_LEN];
pad4 would seem like the natural name for another padding field, and
the comment doesn't seem necessary.
