Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] fio: suggest installing engine package when missing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 6:25 PM Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yigal Korman <ykorman@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Yigal Korman <ykorman@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  ioengines.c | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/ioengines.c b/ioengines.c
> > index 78262bc1..20224e59 100644
> > --- a/ioengines.c
> > +++ b/ioengines.c
> > @@ -79,10 +79,16 @@ static struct ioengine_ops *find_ioengine(const char *name)
> >  static void *dlopen_external(struct thread_data *td, const char *engine)
> >  {
> >       char engine_path[PATH_MAX];
> > +     void *dlhandle;
> >
> >       sprintf(engine_path, "%s/lib%s.so", FIO_EXT_ENG_DIR, engine);
> >
> > -     return dlopen(engine_path, RTLD_LAZY);
> > +     dlhandle = dlopen(engine_path, RTLD_LAZY);
> > +     if (!dlhandle)
> > +             log_info("Engine not available; Install the fio-engine-%s package\n",
> > +                      engine);
> > +
> > +     return dlhandle;
> >  }
> >  #else
> >  #define dlopen_external(td, engine) (NULL)
>
> This assumes fio is part of a package, and that's not always (often?)
> the case.  It may be that the engine simply wasn't built.

I agree.
This patch is more of a showcase of how to help package maintainers
transition users to the new packaging model.
I will drop it from the next patchset version.
This patch might have made more sense if I had implemented a whitelist
of engines that were compiled dynamically.

Thanks,
Yigal

>
> -Jeff
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux