Re: unaligned IO and starting LBA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Robert,

Since I want to use blocksize_unaligned=1 , I had to get rid of direct=1 :

Per man page :
blocksize_unaligned, bs_unaligned
If set, any size in blocksize_range may be used. This typically won't
work with direct I/O, as that normally requires sector alignment.

# fio --name=job1 --filename=/dev/nvme0n1  --rw=randwrite
--ioengine=libaio  --number_ios=1 --debug=io --bs_unaligned=1
--bs=1029 --direct=1
fio: set debug option io
fio: bs_unaligned may not work with raw io

Thanks
smitha

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 8:12 AM Elliott, Robert (Servers)
<elliott@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fio-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fio-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of smitha sunder
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 4:37 PM
> > To: fio <fio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: unaligned IO and starting LBA
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a 512 byte formatted nvme drive and I want to send an unaligned
> > IO and here’s the fio command line I am using , fio version fio-3.7
> >
> > # fio --name=job1 --filename=/dev/nvme0n1  --rw=randwrite
> > --ioengine=libaio  --number_ios=1 --debug=io --bs_unaligned=1
> > --bs=1029
> ...
> > Shouldn’t I see D7BD7CE as the starting LBA for the write based on the
> > above offset (0x1af7af9cec) ?
>
> Without direct=1 you're exercising the OS page cache logic,
> not directly accessing the drive.
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux