gcc 9 complains about directly referencing pointer values in the packed
structure jobs_eta. E.g.:
warning: taking address of packed member of ‘struct jobs_eta’ may
result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
Remove this by using a local void pointer for the rate and iops array
references that generate the warning.
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
---
eta.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eta.c b/eta.c
index b69dd194..647a1bdd 100644
--- a/eta.c
+++ b/eta.c
@@ -392,6 +392,9 @@ bool calc_thread_status(struct jobs_eta *je, int force)
static unsigned long long disp_io_iops[DDIR_RWDIR_CNT];
static struct timespec rate_prev_time, disp_prev_time;
+ void *je_rate = (void *) je->rate;
+ void *je_iops = (void *) je->iops;
+
if (!force) {
if (!(output_format & FIO_OUTPUT_NORMAL) &&
f_out == stdout)
@@ -507,7 +510,7 @@ bool calc_thread_status(struct jobs_eta *je, int force)
if (write_bw_log && rate_time > bw_avg_time && !in_ramp_time(td)) {
calc_rate(unified_rw_rep, rate_time, io_bytes, rate_io_bytes,
- je->rate);
+ je_rate);
memcpy(&rate_prev_time, &now, sizeof(now));
add_agg_sample(sample_val(je->rate[DDIR_READ]), DDIR_READ, 0);
add_agg_sample(sample_val(je->rate[DDIR_WRITE]), DDIR_WRITE, 0);
@@ -519,8 +522,8 @@ bool calc_thread_status(struct jobs_eta *je, int force)
if (!force && !eta_time_within_slack(disp_time))
return false;
- calc_rate(unified_rw_rep, disp_time, io_bytes, disp_io_bytes, je->rate);
- calc_iops(unified_rw_rep, disp_time, io_iops, disp_io_iops, je->iops);
+ calc_rate(unified_rw_rep, disp_time, io_bytes, disp_io_bytes, je_rate);
+ calc_iops(unified_rw_rep, disp_time, io_iops, disp_io_iops, je_iops);
memcpy(&disp_prev_time, &now, sizeof(now));
--
2.21.0
