Jens, On 2018/09/28 13:04, Damien Le Moal wrote: > Jens, > > On 2018/09/28 12:53, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 9/26/18 8:16 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote: >>> As check_swd() is useful for debugging, revert its removal done with >>> commit d60be7d51cbb ("zbd: Remove unused function and variable"). >> >> The problem with dead code is that it's often forgotten when >> other changes are made, and then it doesn't even compile or >> work anymore. >> >> I'd be happier if this was dependent on some debug static >> bool instead, ala: >> >> static bool zbd_debug; >> >> And then have check_swd() do >> >> if (!zbd_debug) >> return; >> >> instead of hiding everything behind an #if 0. > > OK. No problem. I will update and send a v2. > > (and another patch to fix the incorrect comments signaled by Bart) > > Thanks ! Not sending a fix after all: with check_swd() enabled, I am getting a deadlock between check_swd() and zbd_file_reset() on a zone mutex in test 29 when running against regular nullb. That needs to be investigated. But I do not have the time to do so right away. Bart, If you can, please also look at it ? I do not see anything obviously wrong. It may be a very subtle race. Best regards. -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research