On 9/6/18 2:20 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I noticed a couple of things when taking a look at the FIO build recently.
>
> First is that there are some example files named "*.job" instead of
> "*.fio" (e.g. fio-rand-read.job) - was that deliberate?
Not deliberate, I think they should all be named .fio
> Secondly, I was wondering if it's time to remove the fusion-aw-sync
> ("Fusion-io atomic engine") ioengine? My understanding is that it was
> never widely adopted since being introduced around 2013.
Yeah let's kill it, it never really went anywhere.
--
Jens Axboe
