Yes, I'll take a look. Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:11 PM > To: Michael Kelley (EOSG) <Michael.H.Kelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>; fio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Damien Le Moal > <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Zoned block device regression test 11 > > Hello Michael, > > If I run the fio code from > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fbvanassch > e%2Ffio&data=02%7C01%7CMichael.H.Kelley%40microsoft.com%7C358c12cdc3e345932 > 68b08d607c3b02d%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636704934393729 > 755&sdata=uLMcg3Ep0UVuJ031mKlQt6ZSxYToo2Av6W2p62w%2F7SU%3D&reserved > =0 against > Linux kernel v4.18 as follows: > > ./fio/t/zbd/run-tests-against-zoned-nullb > > then all tests except test number 11 pass. If I revert your axmap > patches however then test 11 passes. I think this means that your axmap > patches introduced a regression in the axmap code. Can you have a look > at this? > > Thanks, > > Bart.
