On 7/12/18 1:11 PM, Jeff Furlong wrote: >> Basically the unsigned int version should just be a subset of the >> ull, with the min/max settings things would just work out nicely. > > So the idea is to share the same case statement for both, not > introduce unique case statements for UL and ULL, right? Right, it's just converting (if needed) the general case to be ull based. See how FIO_OPT_INT is basically the same as FIO_OPT_STR_VAL. You might need to add an implicit knowledge that the uint based options have an implied maxval of UINT_MAX, if maxval isn't set, to avoid cases where we can parse much larger values than a particular option may be able to store. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
