Possibly. Who can have a look at the code? > On Mar 16, 2018, at 6:30 PM, Jeff Furlong <jeff.furlong@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > OK, 61% cpu with lfsr and 82% cpu without lfsr. But the throughput is propositionally higher without lfsr, so perhaps that's why cpu util is higher. > > I'm wondering if the lfsr code is single threaded in nature or stuck waiting on a mutex, thereby slowing down the throughput and hence the lower latency. > > Regards, > Jeff > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
