Re: memcpy test: results from adding sse and avx tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6 March 2018 at 19:09, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 3/6/18 12:00 PM, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
>> Right and I'm saying change the how we add the flag and the configure
>> test. If the user explicitly sets sse on the configure line  then
>> assume the user knows what they're doing and add it to the CFLAGS and
>> but always detect (via comping a program that would only work if the
>> user really had told the compiler to use SSE) if its already enabled
>> later (rather than only if the user turned it on). My thinking is that
>> platforms like x86_64 will nearly always have SSE so it would be nice
>> to detect if the compiler somehow already has it on.
>
> Ah I see, yes that might make sense. You could already just do that with
> configure --extra-cflags="-msse", though.

Yes you might but having the explicit option means people won't have
to remember gcc flag names if they don't want to (but I don't really
mind either way). The change I was suggesting would also mean if you
set an option
that somehow included lower ones (e.g. --enable_avx512) you would all
the lower flags automatically.

-- 
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux