Re: randrepeat false for ssds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Depends on your objective (are you trying to dodge tricks your SSD
might do?) but bear in you can't control where the SSD ultimately
chooses to put the data or how much it chooses to stuff into each
erase block size. Additionally randrepeat only has an impact when an
entire run is repeated. Some modern SSDs do compression/de-duplication
so if you want to try defeat that you might want to look at the
refill_buffers/scramble_buffers parameters
(http://fio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fio_doc.html#cmdoption-arg-refill_buffers
).

On 6 February 2017 at 15:54, Slow bucks <frankwhitebe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does it make sense to disable randrepeat on SSDs with the way data is
> written (always write to new block with empty pages)?
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux