On 27 December 2016 at 15:15, Saju Nair <saju.mad.nair@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks..
> We will certainly try with the other verify=<options> of crc32c etc.
> You mention ..
>>>"During a verifying read the data of the block read is kept in RAM and
> if needed (depends on the verification type) the data to compare
> against is regenerated."
>
> This is what we wanted to try and exploit..
> If we have a host RAM of say 64GB, then, we wanted to understand if we
> could break into "N" sets of say 16GB reads and verify. ie:
> Assuming that we need to verify say 160GB of data, we could do :
>
> fio --rw=write
> for i = 0 to 10 {
> fio --rw=read --size=16g --verify=pattern|crc32c
> --verify_pattern=<expected data>
> }
>
> Would that result in each of the FIO reads any faster ?
>
> Regards,
> - Saju.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 27 December 2016 at 04:33, Saju Nair <saju.mad.nair@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Re verification speed: When you say the speed is one tenth that of
>>> > regular reads are the "regular" reads also using numjobs=1? If not the
>>> > comparison isn't fair and you need to rerun it with numjobs=1
>>> > everywhere and tell us what the difference was for those runs.
>>>
>>> Yes, it was with num_jobs = 1 in both cases of "regular read" and "read-verify". I think it is understandable that there is a performance drop, since the compare/verify is done on-the-fly.. Where does FIO store the data read, before the verify step is executed.
>>
>> During a verifying read the data of the block read is kept in RAM and
>> if needed (depends on the verification type) the data to compare
>> against is regenerated. Because of this very little or no data needs
>> to be stored during the write phase.
>>
>> One option to try and speed verification up (assuming you have the
>> spare CPUs) could be to use verify_async (see the HOWTO). Another
>> option could be to use faster verification comparisons (see verify=str
>> of the HOWTO). For example the verify=crc32c checksum calculation will
>> be hardware accelerated on recent x86 machines. Do either of these
>> make a difference?
>>
>> --
>> Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
