RE: Results too good to be true?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: fio-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fio-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Tarek
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 8:31 PM
> Subject: Results too good to be true?
> 
> 10 NVME Intel DC P3600 spec'd at 450K Random Read 32QD 4 Jobs
> I ran 128QD, 3 Jobs each and got aggregate total of  iops=7039.3K!
> That's more than the spec (granted they didn't spec it for 128QD).
> Results below and Fio File below that can you take a look 
> if I am overlooking something?

If you want to match the data sheet, you should replicate the 
data sheet's test conditions: 4 jobs with a queue depth of 32.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/8104/intel-ssd-dc-p3700-review-the-pcie-ssd-transition-begins-with-nvme/3 shows the P3700 is better at QD 128 for random reads:
* 1125 MB/s at QD 32
* 1875 MB/s at QD 128

so you might be seeing a similar effect.

Also, since the data sheet mentions iometer, they must have used
Windows.  Windows and linux drivers don't always deliver equal
performance.

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�������^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux