Re: Stonewall reverse?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/18/2015 01:28 PM, Andrey Kuzmin wrote:
Stonewall option enforces post-serialization in that a job with the
option set waits for all other jobs in the file to complete. I'm
facing a use case where the reverse might be useful: have a number of
jobs wait for the specific one to complete. Is that something that can
be done with the existing options or a new development?

So something like

wait_for=id

and 'id' would refer to a certain job? I can see that being a useful primitive, fio can't currently do that. Though it would be pretty easy to add.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux