On 07/17/2015 08:53 AM, Andrey Kuzmin wrote:
On Jul 17, 2015 5:36 PM, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:axboe@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On 07/17/2015 08:30 AM, Andrey Kuzmin wrote: >> >> Probably worth adding to do_verify() as well. > > > Might be better to ensure that they are reaped when we break out of the loop instead? > That's exactly what happens with the patch, doesn't it?
It might be... It's not very clear why a !td->cur_depth should force us to stay in the loop?
So lets back this up a bit. What problems were observed? Test case? -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
