Re: PATCH: Don't lose pending completions on exit in time- or size-based job with asynchronous I/O engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/17/2015 08:53 AM, Andrey Kuzmin wrote:

On Jul 17, 2015 5:36 PM, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:axboe@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
 >
 > On 07/17/2015 08:30 AM, Andrey Kuzmin wrote:
 >>
 >> Probably worth adding to do_verify() as well.
 >
 >
 > Might be better to ensure that they are reaped when we break out of
the loop instead?
 >

That's exactly what happens with the patch, doesn't it?

It might be... It's not very clear why a !td->cur_depth should force us to stay in the loop?

So lets back this up a bit. What problems were observed? Test case?

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux