Re: Verify concentrated on first few drives

[Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/20/2015 12:53 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/17/2015 10:45 AM, Gavin Martin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Running FIO (2.2.8) with the verify option I see that it seems to
> > concentrate the Reads (from the Verify) on the first few drives and
> > tails off as you run more drives, as reported in the Disk Stats.
> >
> > Is this normal? Does the Verify follow the Round-Robin approach of
> > normal workloads?
> >
> > Config file:-
> > [global]
> > ioengine=libaio
> > iodepth=2
> > direct=1
> > runtime=30s
> > time_based
> > bs=64K
> > verify=meta
> > verify_backlog=32
> > verify_state_save=0
> > stonewall
> > norandommap
> > atomic=1
> >
> > filename=/dev/sdb
> > filename=/dev/sdc
> > filename=/dev/sdd
> > filename=/dev/sde
> > filename=/dev/sdf
> > filename=/dev/sdg
> > filename=/dev/sdh
> > filename=/dev/sdi
> > filename=/dev/sdj
> > filename=/dev/sdk
> > filename=/dev/sdl
> > filename=/dev/sdm
> > filename=/dev/sdn
> > filename=/dev/sdo
> > filename=/dev/sdp
> > filename=/dev/sdq
> > filename=/dev/sdr
> > filename=/dev/sds
> > filename=/dev/sdt
> > filename=/dev/sdu
> > filename=/dev/sdv
> > filename=/dev/sdw
> > filename=/dev/sdx
> > filename=/dev/sdy
> >
> > [RUN01]
> > rw=randwrite
> > do_verify=1
> >
> > Output:-
> > RUN01: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=64K-64K/64K-64K/64K-64K,
> > ioengine=libaio, iodepth=2
> > fio-2.2.8
> > Starting 1 process
> > Jobs: 1 (f=24): [w(1)] [100.0% done] [10199KB/9816KB/0KB /s]
> > [159/153/0 iops] [eta 00m:00s]
> > RUN01: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=22749: Wed Jun 17 10:28:23 2015
> >    write: io=296000KB, bw=9862.5KB/s, iops=154, runt= 30013msec
> >      slat (usec): min=10, max=86, avg=32.74, stdev= 8.18
> >      clat (msec): min=1, max=50, avg=11.80, stdev= 3.94
> >       lat (msec): min=2, max=50, avg=11.83, stdev= 3.94
> >      clat percentiles (usec):
> >       |  1.00th=[ 3120],  5.00th=[ 9408], 10.00th=[10432],
> > 20.00th=[10816],
> >       | 30.00th=[10944], 40.00th=[11072], 50.00th=[11200],
> > 60.00th=[11328],
> >       | 70.00th=[11456], 80.00th=[11584], 90.00th=[12480],
> > 95.00th=[19328],
> >       | 99.00th=[30336], 99.50th=[33024], 99.90th=[44288],
> > 99.95th=[44800],
> >       | 99.99th=[50432]
> >      bw (KB  /s): min= 8431, max=11241, per=100.00%, avg=9876.58,
> > stdev=453.15
> >      lat (usec) : 250=6.93%, 500=36.19%, 750=3.56%, 1000=0.17%
> >      lat (msec) : 2=0.19%, 4=1.19%, 10=4.42%, 20=44.42%, 50=2.91%
> >      lat (msec) : 100=0.01%
> >    cpu          : usr=0.68%, sys=0.99%, ctx=9001, majf=0, minf=87
> >    IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=100.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%,
> > >=64=0.0%
> >       submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%,
> > >=64=0.0%
> >       complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%,
> > >=64=0.0%
> >       issued    : total=r=4608/w=4625/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0,
> > drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
> >       latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=2
> >
> > Run status group 0 (all jobs):
> >    WRITE: io=296000KB, aggrb=9862KB/s, minb=9862KB/s, maxb=9862KB/s,
> > mint=30013msec, maxt=30013msec
> >
> > Disk stats (read/write):
> >    sdb: ios=274/192, merge=0/0, ticks=305/2299, in_queue=2604, util=8.65%
> >    sdc: ios=225/192, merge=0/0, ticks=359/2232, in_queue=2591, util=8.61%
> >    sdd: ios=191/192, merge=0/0, ticks=222/2278, in_queue=2500, util=8.31%
> >    sde: ios=217/192, merge=0/0, ticks=509/2235, in_queue=2744, util=9.12%
> >    sdf: ios=191/192, merge=0/0, ticks=199/2209, in_queue=2408, util=8.01%
> >    sdg: ios=191/192, merge=0/0, ticks=390/2254, in_queue=2644, util=8.80%
> >    sdh: ios=191/192, merge=0/0, ticks=122/2339, in_queue=2461, util=8.19%
> >    sdi: ios=191/192, merge=0/0, ticks=123/2270, in_queue=2393, util=7.95%
> >    sdj: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=107/2188, in_queue=2302, util=7.64%
> >    sdk: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=82/2168, in_queue=2255, util=7.51%
> >    sdl: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=134/2322, in_queue=2456, util=8.17%
> >    sdm: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=131/2152, in_queue=2283, util=7.61%
> >    sdn: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=127/2288, in_queue=2415, util=8.05%
> >    sdo: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=134/2312, in_queue=2446, util=8.13%
> >    sdp: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=128/2258, in_queue=2386, util=7.95%
> >    sdq: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=292/2296, in_queue=2587, util=8.49%
> >    sdr: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=189/2341, in_queue=2530, util=8.27%
> >    sds: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=167/2379, in_queue=2545, util=8.47%
> >    sdt: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=297/2286, in_queue=2583, util=8.39%
> >    sdu: ios=191/191, merge=0/0, ticks=284/2182, in_queue=2465, util=8.15%
> >    sdv: ios=189/191, merge=0/0, ticks=191/2134, in_queue=2325, util=7.72%
> >    sdw: ios=189/191, merge=0/0, ticks=189/2337, in_queue=2526, util=8.36%
> >    sdx: ios=189/191, merge=0/0, ticks=122/2291, in_queue=2413, util=8.06%
> >    sdy: ios=189/191, merge=0/0, ticks=195/2164, in_queue=2359, util=7.86%
> >
> > If I increase the iodepth to 8 it gets even worse. The Writes
> > and utilisation
> >   has increased, but the last few drives are not going through any
> > verification:-
> >
> > Disk stats (read/write):
> >    sdb: ios=970/899, merge=0/0, ticks=624/9107, in_queue=9736,
> > util=32.25%
> >    sdc: ios=901/899, merge=0/0, ticks=622/8927, in_queue=9549,
> > util=31.58%
> >    sdd: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=679/9151, in_queue=9831,
> > util=32.60%
> >    sde: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=657/8991, in_queue=9652,
> > util=32.02%
> >    sdf: ios=899/900, merge=0/0, ticks=591/9044, in_queue=9634,
> > util=31.96%
> >    sdg: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=543/9260, in_queue=9805,
> > util=32.56%
> >    sdh: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=547/9435, in_queue=9982,
> > util=32.82%
> >    sdi: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=488/9365, in_queue=9853,
> > util=32.68%
> >    sdj: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=422/9349, in_queue=9771,
> > util=32.46%
> >    sdk: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=577/9414, in_queue=9991,
> > util=33.11%
> >    sdl: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=507/9199, in_queue=9703,
> > util=32.19%
> >    sdm: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=495/9125, in_queue=9619,
> > util=31.92%
> >    sdn: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=485/9103, in_queue=9587,
> > util=31.82%
> >    sdo: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=501/9240, in_queue=9741,
> > util=32.23%
> >    sdp: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=477/9110, in_queue=9586,
> > util=31.76%
> >    sdq: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=557/9169, in_queue=9726,
> > util=32.11%
> >    sdr: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=545/11115, in_queue=11656,
> > util=35.65%
> >    sds: ios=899/899, merge=0/0, ticks=1266/11542, in_queue=12808,
> > util=36.97%
> >    sdt: ios=330/899, merge=0/0, ticks=363/9283, in_queue=9644,
> > util=31.43%
> >    sdu: ios=0/899, merge=0/0, ticks=0/9211, in_queue=9209, util=30.77%
> >    sdv: ios=0/899, merge=0/0, ticks=0/9232, in_queue=9231, util=30.86%
> >    sdw: ios=0/899, merge=0/0, ticks=0/9470, in_queue=9470, util=31.68%
> >    sdx: ios=0/899, merge=0/0, ticks=0/9342, in_queue=9342, util=31.26%
> >    sdy: ios=0/898, merge=0/0, ticks=0/9174, in_queue=9181, util=30.74%
> >
> > Have I missed an option or have the wrong one in my config file that
> > could be causing this?
>
> That does look very odd. I'll take a look at this. As a temporary
> work-around, you could have separate jobs for each of the devices. Or
> try using your original job file, but add:
>
> verifysort=0
>
> I suspect the latter would also fix it for you.

I looked at the code, and it is an artifact of how the verify sorting 
works. It has a builtin check for overlaps, and includes the file in the 
sorting. This means that it will favor the starting files when you do 
verify like this. If the job ran to completion, you would get full 
verification. Setting verifysort=0 should make the time limited backlog 
verification more fair for you, since it'll turn the backlog into FIFO 
behavior.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in