On 05/13/2015 07:01 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 5/13/2015 9:11 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
It's possible, the Windows part does have its own nanosleep()
function, which fio calls for this part. That's the only OS dependent
bit in this equation.
Bruce?
Well, on Windows the nanosleep() function appears to be working with the
latest fio code, so I'm not sure what might be going wrong.
I did read the code, and it looked OK to me. So ditto, no real idea on
what is going on here. Rodrigo, are you using a 32-bit build? Maybe the
ints overflow. Does it work if you use smaller delays, the 10s delay per
IO is pretty massive.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
