Not sure what validation details you need... C:\>C:\fio-2.1.12-x64\fio --name=benchmark --rw=randread --ioengine=windowsaio - -direct=1 --time_based --ramp_time=10 --runtime=90 --thread --numjobs=1 --invali date=1 --filename=\\.\PhysicalDrive1 --nrfiles=1 --size=16G --bs=4k --iodepth =128 --create_on_open=0 --norandommap --sync=0 --end_fsync=0 --randrepeat=1 --di sable_lat=1 --disable_clat=1 --disable_slat=1 --disable_bw_measurement=1 benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=windowsaio, iodept h=128 fio-2.2.6 Starting 1 thread Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [11.0% done] [3155KB/0KB/0KB /s] [788/0/0 iops] [eta 01m:2 Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [12.0% done] [203.2MB/0KB/0KB /s] [52.2K/0/0 iops] [eta 01 Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [13.0% done] [211.6MB/0KB/0KB /s] [54.2K/0/0 iops] [eta 01 Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [14.0% done] [210.7MB/0KB/0KB /s] [53.1K/0/0 iops] [eta 01 Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [15.0% done] [218.1MB/0KB/0KB /s] [56.5K/0/0 iops] [eta 01 Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [16.0% done] [221.1MB/0KB/0KB /s] [56.6K/0/0 iops] [eta 01 C:\>C:\my_fio\fio --name=benchmark --rw=randread --ioengine=windowsaio --direct= 1 --time_based --ramp_time=10 --runtime=90 --thread --numjobs=1 --invalidate=1 --filename=\\.\PhysicalDrive1 --nrfiles=1 --size=16G --bs=4k --iodepth=128 --c reate_on_open=0 --norandommap --sync=0 --end_fsync=0 --randrepeat=1 --clocksourc e=cpu fio: clocksource=cpu may not be reliable benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=windowsaio, iodept h=128 fio-2.2.7-26-g77e7b Starting 1 thread Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [11.0% done] [8977KB/0KB/0KB /s] [2244/0/0 iops] [eta 01m: Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [12.0% done] [366.2MB/0KB/0KB /s] [93.1K/0/0 iops] [eta 01 Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [13.0% done] [352.5MB/0KB/0KB /s] [90.3K/0/0 iops] [eta 01 Jobs: 1 (f=1): [r(1)] [14.0% done] [373.1MB/0KB/0KB /s] [95.8K/0/0 iops] [eta 01 On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Alireza Haghdoost <haghdoost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Did you guys reproduce exact the same IOMeter IOPS with > FIO on Windows ? Would you please provide more validation details ? > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 05/06/2015 12:35 PM, Iuliu Rus wrote: >>> >>> FYI i have sent a pull request https://github.com/axboe/fio/pull/64 >>> which makes fio on windows on par with iometer. The difference quite >>> big on our local flash machines (60k iops to 100k) >> >> >> Thanks for fixing this up, it's been a pain point for quite a while! >> >> -- >> Jens Axboe >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
