Re: [PATCH] fio: increase max smalloc pools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/03/2015 03:03 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 03/03/2015 04:44 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

For our tests with about 250k files we found the smalloc pool being
depleated.
Now for us values of 3-4 would be enough, but since it is a compile
time switch
I'd like to make it safe for everybody and set 8.

Since it is a dynamic sizing anyway that should hopefully be ok for
everybody.

The reason it was scaled down to 1 pool is because we could run into
situations where one of the forked processes (or threads) would cause
the expansion of pools, and smalloc() could then return memory that
wasn't properly shared (or valid) between all jobs. This was recently
found and fixed, and the smalloc code should probably just be updated to
reflect that. We can't runtime add pools safely.

Right now it's 1 pool at 16MB - how about we just bump it to 64MB for
that one pool? Or, alternatively, pre-add 4 pools initially when smalloc
is setup?

Something like the attached, does that work for you? That's 4 pools of 16MB added. I think that's more flexible than (the more ideal) 1 pool of 64MB, since fio can survive if later pool additions fail. Or we can bump it to 8x16 just to be on the safe side...

--
Jens Axboe

diff --git a/smalloc.c b/smalloc.c
index 66f9ec0dd5c1..378881bb4560 100644
--- a/smalloc.c
+++ b/smalloc.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 #define SMALLOC_BPL	(SMALLOC_BPB * SMALLOC_BPI)
 
 #define INITIAL_SIZE	16*1024*1024	/* new pool size */
-#define MAX_POOLS	1		/* maximum number of pools to setup */
+#define MAX_POOLS	4		/* maximum number of pools to setup */
 
 #define SMALLOC_PRE_RED		0xdeadbeefU
 #define SMALLOC_POST_RED	0x5aa55aa5U
@@ -230,11 +230,21 @@ out_fail:
 
 void sinit(void)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int i, ret;
 
 	lock = fio_rwlock_init();
-	ret = add_pool(&mp[0], INITIAL_SIZE);
-	assert(!ret);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_POOLS; i++) {
+		ret = add_pool(&mp[i], INITIAL_SIZE);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If we added at least one pool, we should be OK for most
+	 * cases.
+	 */
+	assert(i);
 }
 
 static void cleanup_pool(struct pool *pool)
@@ -442,16 +452,17 @@ static void *smalloc_pool(struct pool *pool, size_t size)
 
 void *smalloc(size_t size)
 {
-	unsigned int i;
+	unsigned int i, end_pool;
 
 	if (size != (unsigned int) size)
 		return NULL;
 
 	global_write_lock();
 	i = last_pool;
+	end_pool = nr_pools;
 
 	do {
-		for (; i < nr_pools; i++) {
+		for (; i < end_pool; i++) {
 			void *ptr = smalloc_pool(&mp[i], size);
 
 			if (ptr) {
@@ -461,20 +472,14 @@ void *smalloc(size_t size)
 			}
 		}
 		if (last_pool) {
-			last_pool = 0;
+			end_pool = last_pool;
+			last_pool = i = 0;
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if (nr_pools + 1 > MAX_POOLS)
-			break;
-		else {
-			i = nr_pools;
-			if (add_pool(&mp[nr_pools], size))
-				goto out;
-		}
+		break;
 	} while (1);
 
-out:
 	global_write_unlock();
 	return NULL;
 }

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux