Re: verify_only broken? (was RE: )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/04/2015 02:58 PM, Justin Eno (jeno) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 14:39:29, Justin Eno (jeno) <jeno@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jens,

It appears do_dry_run(), i.e., verify_only, is broken by the last
update to backend.c

I have attached a working patch, though you may prefer a different approach.

Thanks,
Justin

I just realized that I sent this original message without a subject. Perhaps it was dropped for that reason.

I've re-attached the same patch. If it was NAKed, please just let me know and I will work on an alternative.

Also, do you prefer inline or attached patches?

Thanks, didn't see the original. I prefer attached patches, that has a lower risk of some mailer or MTA corrupting it along the way. But unless it's a huge patch, it's not a big deal.

I have applied your patch.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux