Re: Should io_limits/queue depth flushed persist while using verify_state?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17 January 2015 at 09:11, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 16 January 2015 at 17:24, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if this will do the trick, can you check? If not, I'll need the
>> full output of the two runs, and the state files saved from the first run.
>
> I tried revision ae703cdf31532e337cc18c259c883bf5314aa43a which seems
> to already have that patch rolled into it (via commit
> def0009508f0f3c763c4de5e0b62388b42544faf ) but it made no
> difference...
>
> Find the two runs with --debug=all and and the state file attached.

Just checking - did the above arrive correctly?

-- 
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux