Hey, It's been a busy week. I'll try get some samples Sunday to Monday night and report my findings. Thanks for all the work! Michael On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2014-11-05 10:10, Vasily Tarasov wrote: >> >> Below is the demonstration for the latest code in git: >> >> Job-file: >> >> [job] >> filename=/dev/sda >> rw=randread >> blocksize=4096 >> direct=1 >> time_based=1 >> runtime=300 >> numjobs=16 >> >> Command line: >> >> fio --output-format=json --status-interval=10 /tmp/job.file | tee >> /tmp/fio.out >> >> After parsing json and printing per-job "read->runtime" and "read->iops" >> in two >> columns, one can see this: >> >> runtime iops >> 9854 4762 >> 19861 4724 >> 29867 4711 >> 39873 4705 >> 49880 4701 >> 59886 4698 >> 69894 4696 >> 79900 4694 >> 89907 4693 >> 99913 4692 >> 109919 4692 >> 119926 4691 >> 129933 4691 >> 139940 4691 >> 149946 4691 >> 159953 4690 >> 169959 4690 >> 179966 4690 >> 189972 4690 >> 199978 4690 >> 209984 4690 >> 219990 4690 >> 229996 4690 >> 240002 4690 >> 250009 4690 >> 260015 4690 >> 270021 4690 >> 280027 4690 >> 290033 4690 >> 600043 2344 <--- You can see a spurious jump in runtime here >> 300001 4690 >> >> The problem is two-fold, IMHO: >> >> 1) td->ts.runtime[DDIR_READ/DDIR_WRITE/DDIR_TRIM] are set in microseconds >> instead of milliseconds in thread_main() function. The values are >> later >> converted to milliseconds (after exiting from the loop in >> thread_main()), >> but it is too late for the out-of-band access by the helper_thread >> (the one that prints periodic statistics). >> >> 2) The helper_thread in __show_running_run_stats() temporarily adds to >> td->ts.runtime[DDIR_READ/DDIR_WRITE/DDIR_TRIM] >> the time that has passed since the beginning of the loop (td->start). >> However, the same addition happens in thread_main() by the job >> thread and td->start is not reset atomically with this addition. >> As a result, the runtime can be added twice. (That's why in the output >> we see 600043, which is approximately twice larger than the >> previous reading). >> >> My proposal is to make the job threads updating both td->ts.runtime and >> td->start atomically by using an already existing stat_mutex. >> __show_running_run_stats() already takes this mutex where needed. >> >> A proposed patch is attached. > > > Patch looks pretty good, probably not worth it to make this a per-td mutex > instead. But why the extra setting of td->start? > > Michael, did you get a chance to test this? > > -- > Jens Axboe > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
