On 10/24/2014 02:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the code seems to be fine with gcc-isms, so i might suggest anon unions
> instead to make it harder to break:
> union {
> uint64_t __aligner;
> uint16_t continue_on_error;
> };
It's not a bad idea... Your commit broke alignment further down, btw,
but I fixed it up.
I'll be happy to take anon union patches for the alignment parts :-)
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
