On 2014-07-25 09:47, Jiri Horky wrote:
Hi Jens, I wonder if you missed this email or you just didn't like the patch?
I mostly delayed it and then forgot about it. I agree on the notion of using sub-jobs for the index, practically speaking, I think that is the way that people would use it anyway. It'd be confusing if unrelated jobs had different offset increments. And with a bit of simple math, you can even make different groups of jobs index the same parts, if you want.
-- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
