To any applicable persons, My attempts to use block sizes above 8m lead to threads not working properly. I did not notice anything in the documentation stating if there was a limit at 8m. Is this a bug or an intended limit? Has anyone experienced these issues as well? Any work around or fixes? My workloads and results. ********************************* Using 8m and lower BS ********************************** fio --runtime=1h--numjobs=1--filesize=64m --time_based --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --norandommap --refill_buffers -rw=rw --iodepth=128--bs=8m /dev/sdb_rw_128: (g=0): rw=rw, bs=8M-8M/8M-8M/8M-8M, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=128 /dev/sdc_rw_128: (g=0): rw=rw, bs=8M-8M/8M-8M/8M-8M, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=128 /dev/sdd_rw_128: (g=0): rw=rw, bs=8M-8M/8M-8M/8M-8M, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=128 fio-2.1.8 Starting 3 processes Jobs: 3 (f=3): [MMM] [0.2% done] [191.9MB/191.9MB/0KB /s] [23/23/0 iops] [eta 59m:55s] ********************************* Using 16m and Higher BS ********************************** fio --runtime=1h--numjobs=1--filesize=64m --time_based --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --norandommap --refill_buffers -rw=rw --iodepth=128--bs=64m /dev/sdb_rw_128: (g=0): rw=rw, bs=32M-32M/32M-32M/32M-32M, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=128 /dev/sdc_rw_128: (g=0): rw=rw, bs=32M-32M/32M-32M/32M-32M, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=128 /dev/sdd_rw_128: (g=0): rw=rw, bs=32M-32M/32M-32M/32M-32M, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=128 fio-2.1.8 Starting 3 processes fio: pid=8007, got signal=9done] [0KB/0KB/0KB /s] [0/0/0 iops] [eta 1158050434d:01h:53m:55s] Jobs: 2 (f=0): [KMM] [1.9% done] [0KB/0KB/0KB /s] [0/0/0 iops] [eta 59m:42s] ^^ Note no data is being transferred on each thread and the eta is being calculated wrong. Then some threads are reaped when the time adjusts itself. Thank you for your help, Stephen "Nick" Nichols Western Digital Enterprise Storage Group -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
