Re: A bug in combining fsrange and verify

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 27 2014, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27 2014, Wallence Lu wrote:
> > Recreated with fio 2.0.11-35-g8428, the version was checked out from
> > https://github.com/axboe/fio.
> 
> 2.1.4 is the latest, but I don't think that would change anything for
> you.
> 
> > I read a little bit of the source code, it seems to me the randwrite
> > option gets the LBA without specifying the IO size. With that said,
> > for a bsrange option, it is likely one random IO can step onto another
> > IO if they happen to be adjacent. For example, request A has LBA
> > of 1024 and size 8K, request B has LBA 1016 and size 16K. Without
> > checking the request size, request B can overwrite content of request
> > A.
> > 
> > Is that the right interpretation? Do I miss something? Thanks.
> 
> Fio is supposed to handle that, the job file should work. I'll take a
> look at it.

Works for me with the 2.1.4 release. It's actually broken in current
-git, due to the numberio patches...

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux