Re: Why not abort when posix_fallocate() failed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 12 2013, xan.peng wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm recently reading fio source code and running it for test purpose.
> A case bothered me which is fio keep going after posix_fallocate()
> failed, I'm wondering why, shouldn't it abort immediately?

Fio treats it as advisory, like fadvise. Back in the day, fallocate
would often not be available. So it would be hard to treat it as a full
error.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux