Re: All clients impatient

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



emery@xxxxxxx:  Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
In message <50A405C4.50100@xxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe writes:
>On 2012-11-14 12:58, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Should work without group_reporting as well with the below patch. Can
>> you confirm?
>
>Committed the patch, with a few modifications. So fio git should work
>for you now, regardless of whether group_reporting=1 is used or not. I
>suspect you want it on in any case, as you are only interested in the
>aggregate results for the clients.
>
>-- 
>Jens Axboe
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

	I will probably run w/o group_reporting=1. I'm interested
in both the aggregate performance of the cluster filesystem(s), and
the deviation of the individual threads.

	Aggregate performance helps me quickly see whether I'm getting
the performance I expect from the filesystem or filesystems. W/o that
feature I might have to whip out a calculator. :-)

	Individual thread performance lets me know whether one or
more tape drives would be bandwidth starved, which can lead to 
excessive tape wear.

Scott Emery
emery@xxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux