Thanks Josh. Note that at the moment, I'd be happy to just have a simple time delay before ratemin testing begins. Greg. On 17/08/2012, Josh Carter <public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Greg (and all), > > I actually did some work on this, however I didn't have it ready to push > upstream. I used the existing "ratemin" and "rate" configuration options to > represent the starting rate and the final (target) rate, then I added a > "ratestep" option which added to the current rate every 5 "ratecycles". > > Problem was, when I changed the rate, there was a brief spike in bandwidth > for that bw measurement interval. I didn't determine if the problem was > actually in the rate limiting (most likely), or in the bandwidth measurement > (less likely but possible). In any case, I didn't want to offer the patch > until that was solved. > > I'm not able to work on this right now, so I'll pass along the patch as-is. > Maybe someone else can take it and run with it. > > Best regards, > Josh > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
