Am Dienstag, 14. August 2012 schrieb Greg Sullivan:
> On 15 August 2012 03:36, Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
[…]
> > Am Dienstag, 14. August 2012 schrieb Greg Sullivan:
> >
> >> On Aug 14, 2012 11:06 PM, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 08/14/2012 08:24 AM, Greg Sullivan wrote:
> >> > > I need to simulate strict synchronous, round robin i/o to a group of
> >> > > files. I am on Windows 7 32-bit.
> >> > > fio is very nearly working, except that even with a queue depth of 1,
> >> > > it is still resulting in a disk queue that is > 1, because the
> >> > > "iodepth" parameter is not global - it is per thread. (correct?)
> >> > >
> >> > > I've tried using the "sync" engine, however that doesn't work at all -
> >> > > just spews out errors.
> >> >
> >> > That'll be the case for ANY platform and IO engine. If you have more
> >> > than 1 thread or process going, you can have > 1 depth at the device
> >> > side. The definition of a sync IO call is that the call doesn't return
> >> > until the IO is done. If you have overlapped calls due to more than 1
> >> > thread, then that is no longer true.
> >> >
> >> > What you are looking for is outside the scope of an application. You
> >> > would have to limit the queue depth on the operating system side to
> >> > achieve that. Or artificially limit fio in some way, which would not
> >> > make a lot of sense imho.
> >
> >> Thanks Jens. I do in fact have an application that reads in exactly the
> >> manner I described. I have monitored the queue depth - it does not rise
> >> above 1. It is a real time musical sample streamer.
> >>
> >> Please consider this a new feature request for fio - thankyou.
> >
> > Is this application multithreaded? If so, are mutiple threads doing I/O
> > at the same time? If not I´d suggest just testing with one job.
>
> I don't know whether it is multithreaded or not. All I know is that it
> reads many files sequentially and in a round-robin fashion, without
> causing any disk queuing.
>
> Is it possible to read from more than file in a single job, in a
> round-robin fashion? I tried putting more than one file in a single
> job, but it only opened one file. If you mean to just do random reads
> in a single file - I've tried that, and the throughput is
> unrealistically low. I suspect it's because the read-ahead buffer
> cannot be effective for random accesses. Of course, reading
> sequentially from a single file will result in a throughput that is
> far too high to simulate the application.
Have you tried
nrfiles=int
Number of files to use for this job. Default: 1.
openfiles=int
Number of files to keep open at the same time. Default:
nrfiles.
file_service_type=str
Defines how files to service are selected. The follow‐
ing types are defined:
random Choose a file at random
roundrobin
Round robin over open files (default).
sequential Do each file in the set sequen‐
tially.
The number of I/Os to issue before switching a new file
can be specified by appending `:int' to the service
type.
? (see fio manpage).
It seems to me that all you need is nrfiles. I´d bet that fio distributes
the I/O size given among those files, but AFAIR there is something about
that in fio documentation as well.
Use the doc! ;)
Ciao,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
