Re: odd result with iodepth

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chuck Tuffli <ctuffli@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Chris Worley <worleys@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Sequential merging?  Try "randread" instead.
>>
>> Great suggestion. Doing some additional analysis, it does appear that
>> IO's are probably getting merged as I see individual IO requests on
>> the wire of 2-4KB.
>>
>> Googling around this area seems to suggest this kernel behavior isn't
>> something I can disable. So if I honest to goodness *only* want 512B
>> IO, is ioengine=sg the best route?
>
> Try setting /sys/block/sdX/queue/nomerges to 2.  That should completely
> disable merging.

Jeff -

I upgrade to a 3.0 series kernel and set nomerges to 2 and now all the
tools agree on the IOPs number. Thanks!

---chuck
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux