Announce: Linux I/O stack diagram (was: Re: Linux I/O stack design question)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

some months ago I asked several questions regarding the design of the
Linux I/O stack. Thank you all for your feedback you gave.
* We have now drawn the Linux I/O Stack diagram with Inkscape, to have 
  it in svg format and nicer pdf/png's.
* We have licensed it under CC-BY-SA 3.0, so everybody can use and
  alter it when necessary
* I have also included some feedback I got from James Bottomley and 
  Hannes Reinecke at LinuxCon Europe in Prague
* Here is the link to the first published version (version 0.1):
  http://www.thomas-krenn.com/en/oss/linux-io-stack-diagram.html

Can you take a look at it and send us feedback in case there are some
errors left in the diagram?

Best regards,
Werner

On Die, 2011-09-27 at 16:06 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hi Werner!
> 
> Am Montag, 12. September 2011 schrieb Werner Fischer:
> > On Don, 2011-09-08 at 14:39 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 2011-09-05 16:01, Werner Fischer wrote:
> > > > On Don, 2011-09-01 at 15:13 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > >> [...]
> > > >> I mean that every device should plug in at the same place. There are
> > > >> definite up and down sides to plugging in at the stacking level and
> > > >> bypassing the IO scheduler. So you have to weight the pros and cons
> > > >> before doing that. We need to fix this. Drivers doing that lose out on
> > > >> other features in the name of a bit more performance, that's just not
> > > >> acceptable.
> > > > 
> > > > I have updated the diagram according to all of your hints:
> > > > http://www.thomas-krenn.com/de/wikiDE/images/0/07/Linux-IO-Stack.png
> > > > 
> > > > I had also some off-list discussion with Florian Haas, who convinced me
> > > > that the file systems are below of the page cache. I hope this is now
> > > > correct.
> > > 
> > > Not sure I'd agree with that, I'd place the page cache between the fs
> > > and the storage layer.
> > 
> > After some further off-list feedback from Christoph Hellwig I did some
> > updates on the block diagram, including moving the page cache from above
> > the fs layer to next to the fs layer (Christoph told me that the page
> > cache is a helper function for the file systems).
> > I also added SCSI mid layer, SCSI low layer, libata and so on:
> > http://www.thomas-krenn.com/de/wikiDE/images/0/07/Linux-IO-Stack.png
> > 
> > I'm looking forward to further feedback.
> 
> Not that I would like to use it, but where would dmraid sit? I think it would 
> be a bit nearer to the SCSI low layer...
> 
> I am not quite used to the placement of the page cache, but if its merely a 
> helper function for filesystems... Regarding performance measurements it makes 
> a lot of difference. I think the current diagram hides the impact of using 
> pagecache or not using it a bit. So maybe at least coloring it differently 
> would give it a bit more visual weight.
> 
> Aside from that I find this very detailed and I learned quite a bit from just 
> looking at it.
> 
> Can you make that image available as SVG too?
> 
> Thanks,

-- 
: Werner Fischer
: Technology Specialist
: Thomas-Krenn.AG | The server-experts
: http://www.thomas-krenn.com | http://www.thomas-krenn.com/wiki

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux