>> I believe #2 patch is also worth adding to fio, but not sure if I should make
>> it optional feature (/w doc) or not. By wraparounding offset address, it'll
>> probably make benchmark result look better than actual for rotational disk
>> drives. OTOH, it's better than failing to run just because trace-generating
>> device was larger than replaying device.
>
> I worry about the 2nd patch, it's a bit of a hack. You could make it an
> option and turn it on unconditionally for replay_rebase, or at least
> make it conditional on that.
Sure. I'll make it an option ("wraparound=bool"), and submit one as well as #1.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
