Re: fio: when not using a job file, timeouts are not applied

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Can we see your fio command?  I never use job files, and always use
timeouts successfully.

Chris
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Daniel Farina <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello list,
>
> Recently I found a bug whereby when when the --timeout option is
> utilized yet one does not use a job file (instead packing all the jobs
> into the arguments to fio) that timeouts to not work in fio 1.55.
> Having poked around via gdb it does appear the step whereby the
> timeout is propagated throughout the program does not occur when there
> are precisely 0 job files.
>
> Let me know if I can help with additional details, or it is thought
> that I am in error.
>
> Thanks,
> fdr
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux