On 2010-12-13 21:58, Steven Pratt wrote: > Let's try this again without the mangling. Actually this one is also badly mangled :-) > There are a couple of problems with the relatively new ramp_in feature > of fio. First, the estimated time > to completion did not correctly take it into account and bounces around. > Second and more importantly, > the runtime was including ramp in time in throughput calculations even > though the IO done during that > time was ignored, thus making throughput metrics incorrect. This patch > fixes both. Thanks, I hand applied it. You could also remove runtime[] in fio.c:thread_main() since it's now unused, I did that. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
