Il 31/10/2010 02:53, Jens Axboe ha scritto: [cut] > > So you get -1/EINVAL on the issued IO. For O_DIRECT, this will typically > happen for one (or more) of these reasons: > > - The file system doesn't support O_DIRECT, as fio suggests. Since it > works for your other test, we can safely discount that reason. > > - The block size is not a multiple of the block size of the device. I'm > guessing this is your problem. You are using 1K block sizes, if your > dm device has a larger block size, then this will not work. > > It's not likely to be iomem_align, it's more likely to be due to bs=1k > just being too small for your setup. To be sure, please provide a: > > $ grep . /sys/block/dm-0/queue/* > > for dm-0. > Hi Jens here is the output /sys/block/dm-0/queue/discard_granularity:0 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/discard_max_bytes:0 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/discard_zeroes_data:0 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/hw_sector_size:4096 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/iostats:1 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/logical_block_size:4096 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb:32767 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/max_sectors_kb:512 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/max_segment_size:65536 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/max_segments:128 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/minimum_io_size:4096 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/nomerges:0 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/nr_requests:128 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/optimal_io_size:0 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/physical_block_size:4096 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/read_ahead_kb:128 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/rotational:1 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/rq_affinity:1 /sys/block/dm-0/queue/scheduler:noop deadline [cfq] Thank you very much. Best regards, Christian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html