On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:55:34AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > >I am not sure if I understand you correctly. Are you saying that 2.6.31-rc8 > >boots without the stack-trace failure? Can you attach the dmesg please > >and also 'lspci -vvv' output? > > If i built rc8 on F11 ( dual booting) with F12 and install kernel and modules via > > # mount /dev/mapper/serverfedora11-lv_root /mnt > #cd /mnt/usr/src/linux-2.6-xen > # make modules_install install > > in F12 env, then i get a stable kernel rc8 on F12. You contradict yourself latter where you say that the 2.6.31-rc8 built on F12 and installed on F12 has a stack-trace. Or am I misreading it? > > If i compile and and install on F12 kernel has stack trace and is pretty unstable at > runtime. Is the kernel you build on F11 (that being called ServerXen35), with and without Xen producing the same dmesg? That being a dmesg that did not have a stack trace. > > Now i am sending two dmesg reports :- > 1. Kernel 2.6.31-rc8 been built on F11 and installed on F12 > dmesg.log.gz (clean) > 2. Kernel 2.6.31-rc8 been built on F12 and installed on F12 > dmesg.1.gz ( stack trace here) > "lspci -vvv" report has been also sent to you per your request, but i will repeat. This one is for C2D E8400 box. -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
