On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:01:24PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 04:26:32PM +0200, Mark Schloesser wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > I sadly had no luck fixing my X problem. The system seems to run fine > > and as the subject says I moved from 3.4.1-3 to xen-unstable. As I am > > already doing fairly bleeding-edge stuff here I thought this would > > probably make most sense. > > > > As I only have an nvs290 gfx card available right now I can't check if > > this is the problem. But I'll try to get my hands on some other cards > > for next week. > > > > Today I read through a lot of mailing list archives and PDFs trying to > > dig deeper into the IOMMU/PCI passthrough stuff and I want to give the > > graphics passthrough situation a shot myself. Sadly it is very confusing > > to read about the different setups and hardware environments with both > > positive and negative results. Also the patchsets and versions everybody > > is talking about do not make it any easier :) > > > > VGA/GFX passthrough is very much under development atm, it's very new stuff. > > > My current questions would be: > > - is the combination of JF git kernel with xen-unstable the right way to > > go for this setup? Or should I perhaps use older xen version and apply > > some patchset? I think some of those patches were applied in > > xen-unstable already but I am not quite sure... > > > > Some people are using http://xenbits.xen.org/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg as dom0 kernel. > > That's the old xenlinux kernel, the default dom0 kernel for Xen 3.4.x > and earlier versions. > And based on the recent emails on xen-devel, I think some people got it working also using pv_ops dom0 kernel. -- Pasi -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
