On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:15:00AM +0000, Evan Lavelle wrote: > It seems I've been a bit thick. It's been pretty obvious recently that > Xen isn't flavour of the month around here, but I assumed there were > good reasons for that. Now, rather belatedly, I've found > > http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2008/qumranet.html > > In short, RedHat paid $107 million for Qumranet in September 2008. The > acquisition includes KVM. > > I've got 2 years invested in Xen, on FC8, and I can't help feeling that > I've been shafted. Am I alone? Not alone, same situation for me. I am using Xen aprox 2 years too on our university, but with end of F8 there is not a fully functional Xen Dom0 and also DomU kernel for any stable Fedora. KVM is still not a replacement for paravirtualized machines and I think fully virtualized KVM will be slower like a paravirtualized XEN. Also I am missing some howtos for migration to KVM/xenner. Jan ONDREJ (SAL) -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
