On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 12:48:22PM -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote: > On 2009-01-09 9:10 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > I think the current list would be a good place for people > >still using Fedora<= 8 with Xen, but it's just a suggestion:-) > > Or in a couple months the people using Xen again with F10 (probably) right? Depends if Dom0 patches are accepted into 2.6.29 kernel or not and then whether that kernel is stable enough for a F10 update... > If you had decided to change this list's name I'd have had no > objections. I can also subscribe to another list, make a new procmail > rule, and dump the messages from both lists into the same folder, but it > seems like a bunch of work replicated among n subscribers. Unless the > goal is to keep down the noise from the Xen riff-raff for KVM folks. ;) Sadly changing mailing list names is effectively impossible with Mailman :-( Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
