On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 02:41:40PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:27:58AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > > Itamar - IspBrasil wrote: > > > +1 for pushing it. > > > +1 for a updated version of virt-manager in fc8 too. > > > > > > > If libvirt 0.4.6 is pushed for F8, I'll push the > > latest virt-manager + virtinst as well. > > I think it is a bad idea to push major new versions of anything to a > distro that is about to go end of life. We've only just released these > new libvirt, virt-manager & virtinst packages. We *will* cause regressions > in functionality in F8, and with it about to go end of life, we'll be > unable to push further updates to fix the regressions. > > If someone really badly wants new libvirt/virt-manager for F8, then they > can easily just take the new RPMs from F9/10 and do a rpmbuild --rebuild > on the src. This avoids causing regressions for anyone else on F8 who > don't care. The other solution is to build the package in Testing and not push it to Stable, like I did for libvirt, I think this minimize the risks while avoiding the multiple builds (and hence risk of massive divergence of the versions). Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen