On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:15:43PM +0200, Laszlo BERES wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange írta: > > >for this to be ready for Fedora 10. So if you need to use Fedora 10 > >as a host, then KVM is your only viable option at this time. If > >you can wait for Fedora 11 (or use RHEL-5 / CentOS-5) then Xen may > >be an option for you. I'll let other people comment on the pros/cons > >of Xen vs KVM outside the kernel availability issue. > > Aren't you planning to extend the lifecycle of Fedora 8 as the last > available version with dom0 support? Extending the Fedora 8 lifecycle would impose an extra support burden on all Fedora package maintainers that is not really practical. If you need a long term deployable Xen host, then really you should be looking at RHEL-5 or CentOS-5 depending on whether you need commercial support (RHEL) or not (CentOS). Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
