On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 11:39:27AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 22:24 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: > > > Given that xen is entering feature freeze for updated release ~August > > is it too early to ask what the *hopes* are for xen in fedora10? > > There has been very little progress on the Dom0 pv_ops work of late, so > it's getting harder to imagine it being in shape for Fedora 10. Still > hope, for sure, but getting slimmer. > > > xen 3.3.0 (or late rc) or is this still likely to be 3.2.1 or 3.2.2? > > Not really important if there's no Dom0 kernel. If there is, we'll > definitely update. > > > kernel 2.6.27(or late rc) with pv_ops for 32 and 64 bit, dom0 and domU? > > I would expect our DomU kernel to continue tracking the bare-metal > kernel versions - so, yeah, 2.6.27 probably. > > Jeremy Fitzhardinge sounds fairly confident of having much of x86_64 > DomU ready for the 2.6.27 merge window. If that happens, our patch set > would be quite small and I'd imagine we'd enable CONFIG_XEN in the > bare-metal kernel and drop the kernel-xen package. > At the moment it looks like x86_64 xen domU patches are going in for 2.6.27. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=summary and http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps -- Pasi -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
