On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 09:48:17PM +0000, Martin Vuille wrote: > "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in > news:20080620212533.GA12531@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > > > > > You'll need to ask Dan Berrange to be certain, but I'm pretty > > sure the plan is to have a dom0 kernel ready some time during > > the lifetime of F9. > > > > The reason we don't have an F9 dom0 kernel right now is > > because there *isn't one*. Ask XenSource to provide > > something more recent than > 2 year old Linux 2.6.18 support! > > Red Hat are committing two full time developers right now to > > fix this situation, but it is NOT our fault. > > > > Thanks for the clarification. I'll keep on the lookout for updates > in F9. Fedora 9 is basically DomU only and we're still working on getting the x86_64 patches accepted in upstream LKML trees. Best guess is that this will be 2.6.27 . In parallel we're still working on Dom0 support with pvops http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0 Daniel. -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
