On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:57:09AM -0500, Dustin Henning wrote:
> I was reading an article about Windows PE 2.0 in virtual
> environments, and apparently Windows PE 2.0 is based on Vista, which doesn't
> have a driver for the default NIC used by VMWare. The suggested solution is
> to use a different virtual NIC (a gigabit one). Obviously Xen isn't VMWare,
> and on top of that, I am not trying to run Windows PE 2.0, or even Vista.
> However, I had long wondered but never asked this question:
> Does Xen have any virtual NICs other than the two mentioned in the
> hvm example files in /etc/xen? More importantly, does it matter, for
> instance, will Xen or Windows limit the response time or throughput to
> 100MB/s levels in an hvm environment if a 100MB/s virtual NIC is used? I
> don't see why it would, but then again, I don't see why SATAII hard drives
> running on controllers in IDE mode are slowed to IDE speeds, so I wouldn't
> be surprised if it did, and I am hoping someone can tell me. Thanks,
> Dustin
>
Xen HVM guests see _emulated_ hardware. Emulated NIC, Emulated ide/disk
controller, etc.
Emulation is slow.
You need to have/install paravirtualized (=optimized) drivers that "bypass"
the whole emulation layer and talk directly to Xen.. this way you can get
good performance.
Xen includes paravirtualized drivers ("unmodified drivers") for linux HVM
guests.
People are working with free/opensource paravirtualized drivers for Windows
HVM guests atm, but they're not really usable/stable yet.
XenEnterprise, VirtualIron, and Novell SLES have Windows HVM pv drivers
available.. if you buy those products.
-- Pasi
--
Fedora-xen mailing list
Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
