On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:04:30PM -0800, David Levinger wrote: > Thank Dale for your quick reply! I've definitely started to realize that > libvirt was what was creating the 192.168.122 subnet but I'm still > unclear on what I'd need to do to go back to something like xenbr0. > > What would I end up putting into /etc/sysconfi/network-scripts after > changing the line to /bin/true that would allow my xen guests to just > get IPs on the same subnet that the host is on. Just passing > communication through. > > Thanks again and my apologies if this sounds like a stupid question :-) > > David Hi David. The instructions you need to set up bridging on a Fedora or RHEL installation are at http://watzmann.net/blog/index.php/2007/04/27/networking_with_kvm_and_libvirt . Basically what you wind up doing is disabling Xen bridging altogether and using your linux distribution's networking scripts to set the bridge up reliably for your guests. The only reason not to use Xen's native bridging is that it tries to be distro-agnostic and the result is predictably poor. Once you disable that (by the "/bin/true" change above) and set up the bridge as described, you should have no difficulty. Best of luck, --Hugh -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen