Re: Kickstart slowness with virt-install

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:50:16PM +0100, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> 
> > Yes, upfront time will be longer due to the need to pre-allocate the
> > disk, this should be more than offset by the faster install time. So
> > I'd use --nonsparse as a general rule.
> 
> So why isn't that the default for virt-install? The other risk is the
> admin creating a truckload of sparse images, and the guests ending
> with really odd problems months later when it turns out there isn't
> enough diskspace, and no one can figure out this has happened after
> running so well before...

If we were writing virt-install again today, we would make it the
default, but we've had two Fedora release where virt-install defaulted
to sparse files. Changing existing behaviour of a command isn't all that
nice, even if there are potential benefits to be had. So we added the
--nonsparse flag and left the existing behaviour unchanged.

Regards,
Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

--
Fedora-xen mailing list
Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General]     [Fedora Music]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Directory]     [PAM]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux