Hello,
I can not setup any guest’s becose of missing interfaces.
/var/log/xend-debug.log:
Link veth0 is missing.
This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of
interfaces that the loopback driver supports. If the loopback driver is
a module, you may raise this limit by passing it as a parameter
(nloopbacks=<N>); if the driver is compiled statically into the kernel,
then you may set the parameter using loopback.nloopbacks=<N> on the
domain 0 kernel command line.
interface tun0 does not exist!
interface tun0 does not exist!
interface tun0 does not exist!
interface tun0 does not exist!
From dmesg:
bnx2: eth0 NIC Link is Up, 1000 Mbps full duplex
bnx2: eth1 NIC Link is Up, 1000 Mbps full duplex
bnx2: eth2 NIC Link is Up, 1000 Mbps full duplex
bnx2: eth3 NIC Link is Up, 1000 Mbps full duplex
/etc/grub.conf:
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that
# all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
# root (hd0,0)
# kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/fcvg/slash
# initrd /initrd-version.img
#boot=/dev/cciss/c0d0
default=0
timeout=10
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
#hiddenmenu
title Fedora Core (2.6.17-1.2174_FC5xen)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /xen.gz-2.6.17-1.2174_FC5-PAE dom0_mem=512000 loopback.nloopbacks=128
module /vmlinuz-2.6.17-1.2174_FC5xen ro root=/dev/fcvg/slash
module /initrd-2.6.17-1.2174_FC5xen.img
title Fedora Core (2.6.17-1.2174_FC5smp)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.17-1.2174_FC5smp ro root=/dev/fcvg/slash
initrd /initrd-2.6.17-1.2174_FC5smp.img
title Fedora Core 5 (2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp ro root=/dev/fcvg/slash
initrd /initrd-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp.img
Hardware: HP DL380 G5, 16G memory, 4 nic’s from type bnx2, eth0 – eth3 are all there.
ifconfig –a prints eth0,eth1,eth2,eth3,lo
With kernel parameter “loopback.nloopbacks=128” i have the same problem.
Again with loopback.nloopbacks= …32,48,128,164,256… always no tun0 or xenbr0.
What can be wrong here ?
Many thanks for any help.
Thomas
-- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
