On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:14:37PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Could you confirm that my patch on top of the old one does what you
> intend? The only functional change that I found was that the change of
> possition of the num -= colllapsed line, and I agree with the change :)
Hi Juan.
The line which follows num -= collapsed is also necessary.
Without that, the rsvd_region[] at the end may be discarded.
- for (k = j + 1; k < j + 1 + collapsed; k++) {
+ for (k = j + 1; k < num; k++)
Thanks.
--
yamahata
--
Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
